The Canadian funding system is rather unique in Canada. The major funding for badminton actually comes from Sport Canada. Sport Canada is a government agency responsible for identifying and funding potential athletes that can place in the Top 16 at the World Championships and Olympics. That's the general idea. It's a rather broad protocol, as a lot of sports are supported through this system, so specifics are left for the National Sport Organizations (NSOs) to figure out. The Sport Canada system is referred to as the Athlete Assistance Program, or AAP, with funding given out in 'cards', or 'carding', as I will refer to it.
Different sports will have different amounts of funding, as in a different number of cards. How the system works is that Sport Canada will fund individuals based on the NSOs criteria. So a Doubles team for Badminton would require 2 cards for both players to be funded, for example. Here is a list of Canadian athletes who are getting funding. I don't believe Badminton is included because of our lengthy appeal process, but the list will be up shortly.
http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/sc/pgm/APAA-eng.pdf
As you can see, there are quite a few cards for certain sports. Generally, the more of a medal/podium potential of a sport, the more cards the sport gets. How many cards do you think badminton has? If you guessed 5 or 6, you would be correct, but let's break down the details a little further first. There are 3 types of cards. SR (senior) cards, C1 (first-year senior cards), and D (developmental) cards. D-cards are for U-23 athletes and funding comes at $900 CAD/month for a year, so that means $10 800 CAD/year. C1 cards are given to athletes who are eligible for senior cards, but it's their first year. Unforutnately, that means they also get $900 CAD/month ($10 800 CAD/year), but only for the first year. After that, if they get senior carded again, they get the SR card status of $1500 CAD/month, or $18 000 CAD/year. Now that you have a general understanding, Badminton Canada gets 5 SR cards per year. However, 2 SR cards can be split into 3 D-cards. The advantage of this is that Badminton Canada can fund 6 people now (3 SR + 3 D), but there is obviously less money to go around. For this current year (November 2010-October 2011), we have 6 cards. As far as I know, here are the Canadian athletes receiving funding for this year:
Stephan Wojcikiewicz (MS)
David Snider (MS)
Joycelyn Ko (WS)
Michelle Li (WS/WD - unclear which event, but most likely WS)
Alex Bruce (WD)
Phyllis Chan (unclear)
Let's break things down again. However, there is a little bit of uncertainty because I'm not sure who has what card, but I can make an educated guess. Here was the original proposed list by Badminton Canada back in October 2010 (to the best of my memory):
Toby Ng (SR)
Grace Gao (SR)
Stephan Wojcikiewicz (SR)
Michelle Li (D)
Dave Snider (D)
Alex Bruce (D)
But, Sport Canada rejected it based on Badminton Canada's carding criteria, since athletes had to meet the published 2010-2011 criteria, so it became:
Michelle Li (C1)
Dave Snider (SR)
Joycelyn Ko (C1)
Alex Bruce (D)
Alex Pang (D)
Phyllis Chan (D)
Stephan, Grace, and I appealed, but only Stephan made it through, so from what I can deduce, the carding situation at the moment should be:
Stephan Wojcikiewicz (SR)
Dave Snider (SR)
Joycelyn Ko (SR)
Michelle Li (D)
Alex Bruce (D)
Phyllis Chan (D)
Though this may be incorrect, this is how it must be, as Joycelyn is ineligible for a D-card, and Dave Snider should be keeping his SR card. As Stephan also is ineligible for a D card, he must have an SR card, meaning Michelle has been demoted to a D card. Hopefully, this is incorrect, because if anything, Michelle should be keeping a C1 (Senior) card with Dave being demoted because Michelle had better results (based on 2010 Nationals placing and World Ranking). Anyway, let's breakdown how each athlete qualified. I will try to just lay out the facts without adding my own opinion. You can decide for yourself how ridiculous it is.
First off, everyone who qualified for Carding on that list qualified based on results at the 2010 Canadian National Championships in Winnipeg. Grace and I had a freak loss in the QFs because we just came back from Asia. We played Korea Open, then Malaysia Open, then came back the next week for Nationals. It gets a little more complicated, but at the moment, it isn't the topic at hand. Since we made a QF only, we were ineligible for carding because you need to have finished in the top 3 (which was later changed to top 4, as Stephan appealed).
- Stephan (4th Place MS) - lost in SF to Martin Guiffre; lost 3/4 to Dave Snider (via Walkover)
- Dave Snider (3rd Place MS) - lost in SF to Alex Pang
- Joycelyn Ko (3rd Place WS) - lost in SF to Michelle Li; won 3/4 vs Valerie St. Jacques
- Michelle Li (2nd Place WS/2nd Place WD) - lost in F to Anna Rice (WS); lost in F to Melody Liang/Lydia Jiang (WD)
- Alex Bruce (2nd Place WD) - lost in F to Melody Liang/Lydia Jiang (WD)
- Phyllis Chan (Results from U23 Nationals - 2nd Place WS, 1st Place WD) - lost in F to Michelle Li; won WD with Melody Liang
Though Grace and I had lost in the QF for XD, it is worth noting that I had a 2nd place in MD with Adrian Liu, while Grace had a 3rd place in WD with Anna Rice at the Nationals. However, these results cannot be used because the carding criteria has certain restrictions.
It goes a little further though, because in the respective event, placing in the top 4 at Nationals is just one of the eligibility criteria. World Ranking also makes a difference, so that is why Stephan and Dave have carding over Alex Pang, because Alex's World Ranking was the lowest. But that's all Priority #3 of the Carding Criteria. Since we didn't qualify for Priority #3, we had to attempt Priority #2: International Results. If you're that curious, Priority #1 is a top-16 World Ranking by the way. Anyway, back to the International Results, the 2009-2010 criteria for Priority #2 was only TWO International results from the following list:
- International Challenge - 1
- Grand Prix - Top 2
- Grand Prix Gold - Top 8
- Super Series - Top 16
- Defeat a team in the Top 20 in a BWF competition
But unfortunately for us, it was changed to FOUR Internationa results for 2010-2011 from the following list:
- International Challege - 1
- Grand Prix - Top 2
- Grand Prix Gold - Top 4
- Super Series - Top 8
- Defeat a team in the Top 20 in a BWF competition
Also, the qualifying period changed from October 1, 2008-September 30, 2009 to October 1, 2009-August 31, 2010, reducing the qualifying period by a month. In any case, let's look at our athletes again (rough estimate of International results):
- Stephan: 2009 Pan Am Champs - 2nd (MS)
- Dave: N/A
- Joycelyn: 2009 Pan Am Champs - 2nd (WS)
- Michelle: N/A (honorable mentions: Peru IC & Canada IC (WS): 2nd Place)
- Alex: N/A
- Phyllis: N/A (honorable mention: Peru IC (XD): 2nd Place).
Whereas, Grace and I had a few more:
- Toby/Grace (XD): 2009 Pan Am Champs, 2010 Peru IC, & 2010 Canada IC: 1st Place; honorable mention: Guatemala IC - 1st place (mid-September 2010).
We technically made 4 results if we include September 2010 and make it a 12 month qualifying period. Otherwise, we would have met it for sure if we only needed 2 results (based on 2009-2010 criteria). But since we didn't follow the EXACT criteria, Badminton Canada had to default to people who were eligible based on exact criteria, hence the 2nd list because Sport Canada turned down the first one. However, since they knew we were going to appeal the decision, they froze the money until we sorted things out. Badminton Canada then had to assemble an Internal Appeals Committee which included:
- Fiona McKee (Badminton Canada Player's Association Representative - Vice President)
- Frank Gaudet (Badminton Saskatchewan - President)
- Grant McDonald (Badminton Saskatchewan - Executive Director & was the Committee Leader for our Internal Appeal)
- Maurice Boudreau (Badminton New Brunswick - President)
Unfortunately, they couldn't find a 5th person, as is usually required. Also, Fiona McKee and I never got along, so that was another issue that was temporarily raised, but not addressed. As the Player's Association's other member was my brother, that would have definitely been a conflict. As for the other committee members, in MY OPINION, they don't have any clue about International badminton. My reasoning comes from the amount of International Canadian athletes they have produced recently, or have qualified to apply for AAP carding: ZERO. Yes, nobody from those two provinces have done very well in a long time, so how would one know much about International competition and attaining International results? Hence, I will go to my theory that Fiona led the way with her 'experience' and International tournament 'expertise'. I still find it a little awkward that the entire committee came to a unanimous decision that 6 months is good enough to attain 3 of the eligible International results. For a Canadian team, I find it rather difficult, as it's not like we can look in the past for past Canadians who met such requirements, especially not in Fiona McKee's personal 2008 Olympic run with Charmaine Reid. I believe I heard her say she played 30+ tournaments that year. I wonder if she met "4 International results in 11 months", because with her experience, meeting "3 International results in 6 months" as a Canadian team is definitely doable... plus loads of other reasons against us. For example, we made a claim that the jet lag affected us at the 2010 Nationals, causing us to grossly underperform. The Committee then made a statement stating that we performed better with our respective partners in our respective Double's events. Clearly, they did not think their statement through, because that is actually what we were arguing to begin with. As Grace and I were both affected by jet lag, we should probably perform better in our Doubles events because our respective partners wouldn't be affected by the jet lag. Nobody else made an attempt at Korea and Malaysia Super Series in 2010 either, but oh well, please decide for yourself.
In the end, we were turned down by the Internal Appeals Committee and Badminton Canada was bound by their decision. We tried to appeal again with the Sport Dispute Resolution Center of Canada (SDRCC) but that was very recently declined as well. However, we will find out the reasoning behind it soon enough. I anticipate it may be due to the technicality of things, more or less certain wording or procedures that we might have missed. I'm not a lawyer and I don't think I ever will be, so what would I know about these things anyway? I'm supposed to be a badminton player, but I guess we need to insert an adjective now, because I'm now a "poor" badminton player. Interpret that anyway you want, because making money takes time away from training... enough said.
So, that's a general idea of the overall carding situation. If you would like more details, please comment on the post, or ask me, PM me, etc. If you can brainstorm any ideas for better criteria, please share those as well, because I hope to be able to help make changes to this broken system so that these things won't hurt the deserving athletes. Though everyone who was eligible is deserving of a card, when push comes to shove and there isn't enough funding for everyone, just leaving it to the system to solve the problem may not be the best idea.
Oh, just for the record, we qualified for the upcoming year (2011-2012) of carding ONE WEEK after we received word of our carding application being declined in November 2010... so yeah, it's definitely frustrating... Also, I'm NOT mad at Badminton Canada, just the Internal Appeal Committee members. Badminton Canada maintained a very neutral stance, and though it would have been nice for them to just come out and nominate us, at least they remained very neutral... unlike the Internal Appeals Committee (in MY opinion). I hope I presented mostly factual information in this article and I hope I wasn't too biased.
Thank you for your time if you read the article. I hope you get a better picture of at least my side of the story.
Source: http://towbsss.blogspot.com/2011/07/canadian-badminton-funding-system.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.